Why Emotions Make CEOs Superhuman

Posted on: April 22nd, 2012 by socialventurenetwork No Comments

Written by Teju Ravilochan, Unreasonable Institute Co-Founder & VP Partnerships and Communication.

In the opening Plenary of the 2012 SVN Annual Member Gathering, Chip Conley took us back to when he was getting his MBA at Stanford Business School. He harbored dreams of being a great CEO. His then-classmate Seth Godin asked him what he would need to achieve that. Chip answered “a great CEO must be superhuman,” explaining a CEO needed to be the smartest person in the room at all times, someone who always knows what he was doing.

Once he graduated, Chip indeed pursued his dream. At 26, He started Joie de Vivre, one of the world’s largest hospitality companies. Today, it’s worth $200 million, has earned the #1 customer service award in the United States, has provided fodder for Chip’s 4 New York Times best-selling books, and has earned him the title of “Most Innovative CEO in the Bay Area.”

With a quarter-century of CEO experience under his belt, Chip returned to the question that Seth Godin had asked him in MBA school. He realized he wouldn’t have changed a word in his answer. Just the emphasis.

“A great CEO must be super human, he now believes. In other words, a CEO’s success comes from an understanding of what it means to be human, of embodying humanity herself, and of providing a space for her team to do the same. Chip broke down what this meant into two components.

1. “The CEO serves as the emotional thermostat of her team.” The CEO’s first job is to help a team understand its emotions. Stress, miscommunication, and mistakes can lead teams to conflict. In those moments, people can react emotionally and unconstructively. “We lose 10-15 IQ points when making decisions during amygdala hijack [the flight-or-fight response],” as Albert Einstein once explained.

But even when emotions are running high and teams are stressed, Chip explains that CEOs can offer a simple way out: measuring the team’s emotional status through open sharing. Simply voicing an emotion, be it nervousness, anger, or fear, “takes you from the amygdala to the prefrontal cortex.” Acting from the prefrontal cortex, which controls higher-level emotions like gratitude, happiness, and empathy, a team can make stronger decisions and work together more effectively.

2. The CEO helps their team understand the relationship between emotions. Once members of a team have the chance to express their emotions with one another, the next question becomes how to use those emotions to constructive ends. Chip offered three key “emotional equations” that clarify how emotions relate to one another, providing an actionable framework for dealing with challenging emotions

  • Despair = Suffering – Meaning
  • Happiness = Gratitude / Gratification
  • Anxiety (#1 emotion in American business) = uncertainty (what you don’t know) x powerlessness (what you can’t control)

Chip explains that the key to CEO success, in his experience, has come from an understanding of both how to allow people to express emotions and how to help people understand how their emotions relate. Doing this is what makes CEOs super human, and what enables them to create great companies.

Share

Running A Mature Organic Food Business

Posted on: April 22nd, 2012 by socialventurenetwork No Comments

Written by Evan Coller, Social Venture Network


Introduced by SVN co-founder Josh Mailman as, “One of the great stories in Business”, the Organically Grown Company is the largest distributer of organics in the Northwest. Josh Hinerfeld, CEO, and, Natalie Reitman-White, Head of Sustainability for Organically Grown Company lead an afternoon discussion at the SVN 2012 Annual Member Gathering on the challenges of scaling up in a niche market.

Stemming from the cooperative living methods that grew out of the social movement crowd of the 1960’s, Organically Grown Company started in 1978 as a nonprofit group supporting local organic farming in Eugene, Oregon.

Over the next two decades Organically Grown Company was a catalyst in creating a legitimate market for organic produce and establishing laws that contributed to the ongoing success of the movement as a whole.  They have also helped to build a strong network of organizations that are working to preserve the authenticity of organic foods.

These “change agents in the food system” are looking beyond organic produce, setting their eyes on a new mission to lead a sustainable business as a whole.

Organically Grown Company continues to thrive as an employee and grower owned company thrives on their shared ownership business model with their growers and employees.

Some key challenges for Organically Grown Company looking forward that were highlighted in the video:

Conventional Transportation: Finding alternatives to conventional truck transportation and fuel systems.

Handling the complexity of running a business on small farmers: Greater capacity is reflected by an opportunity to increase differentiation. Differentiation means more specialization and compartmentalization in facilities. This increases the need for efficiency.

Increasing production while preserving locality: Providing full truck loads at every stop year-round isn’t possible without importing produce from out of state and outside the country.

Moving past a conventional business model: How can Organically Grown Company adapt its business model to further support the needs of growers, staff and community members that provide an invaluable contribution to the advancement of the organic food industry.

Continue to debunk the argument for big agriculture: Organic food sales are 5% of the market. There is a lot of progress to be made to ensure that organic foods hold a larger stake in the future. For more insight on why organic food is vital to our future click here.

Josh and Natalie see themselves as the “paramedics of the food industry”. Incubating the next generation of leaders in environmental justice and organic food production is an important step in the growth of Organically Grown Company’s goal to be a leader in sustainable business.

2012 Annual Member Gathering: Plenary: The Future Is Organic

Share

5 Ways to Grow Businesses in Developing Economies

Posted on: April 22nd, 2012 by socialventurenetwork No Comments

April 20, 2012: Social Venture Network Annual Member Gathering

Written by Sara Yap, SVN Manager of Member Services and Engagement

If the notion of building new markets and solutions to fight poverty seems like a daunting endeavor, well, I don’t exactly blame you. The words conjure up government programs and development aid gone astray or imperialist dreams that don’t quite hit the mark. Whether it’s measuring social impact or being mindful of the cultural intricacies of working in new markets, three speakers contributed to a tactical discussion on Building Markets and New Solutions to Fight Poverty:

The speakers shared their personal insights on ways to advance new market growth in emerging economies:

1. Create jobs that people can depend on.

2. Locals know best; invite them to serve as the community-based experts.

3. Some of the most powerful ways to create and forge new business relationships are to build regional alliances. As an entrepreneur working in a community ask, “How do we best resource the locally-based relationships?” Put yourself into the mindset of the group to make the business/startup relevant. (V. Bhansali, IDEX)

4. For local businesses, self-help groups (cohorts of women helping each other) inspire confidence in females as they realize their own roles in a community business. Self-help groups encourage women to support and motivate one another. (S. Shenoy, Upaya).

5. The most innovative organizations are the ones with an iterative trajectory.

The discussion inspired listeners to think through business strategies and brought audience members to continue the conversation on:

Follow the latest initiatives of Sseko, Upaya and IDEX by following them on Twitter at: @SsekoDesigns@UpayaSV@IDEX,

Share

Why High-School Dropouts Are This Business’s Competitive Advantage

Posted on: April 22nd, 2012 by socialventurenetwork No Comments

Written by Teju Ravilochan, Co-Founder and VP of Partnerships and Communication, Unreasonable Institute

Yesterday, I had the privilege of attending a session with Al Fuller, CEO and Chairman of the Integrated Packaging Company (IPC). The Integrated Packaging Company, founded in 1992, is a manufacturer of corrugated boxes. They have well-serving Fortune 500 companies as their main clients, many of whom have relied on IPC for more than a decade. In my view, however, what’s most remarkable about IPC is how they treat their employees.

In the book Switch: How to Change Things When Change is Hard, authors Chip and Dan Heath discuss the importance of “growing your people” in order to create change. That principle is clearly alive at IPC. Aiming to improve the lives of impoverished people, IPC hires only workers who have a high school education or lower. They provide them the training and skills development not only to perform their job, but also a platform for upward social mobility. Al described their three-pronged strategy to engaging the workforce in places like Detroit and New Orleans.

  1. Understanding Their Workforce. What IPC quickly learned is that one of the most dignified opportunities they could provide to low-income people is a reliable job where they could grow their skills. Whether or not workers remained with the company, they would be able to use those skills to generate greater income over time. What’s more, simply providing jobs in often has unexpected benefits. The IPC observed that when they began business New Orleans, 20% of the spouses of their hourly workers began their own small businesses within 6 years. Albert explained that when a household is given resources, people gain enough of a toehold to improve their own lives.
  2. Expecting the best. Albert described how IPC fires 50% of the people they hire for not showing up to work or other problems. Once an employee is fired, they can be re-hired after thirty days. Each employee gets 3 strikes, meaning they can be fired twice and get re-hired both times mandatory month-long off-periods. But in 20 years, IPC has only had to fire 2 workers three times. Through this sort of accountability structure, IPC doesn’t punish its workers, but instead offers them a chance (or three) to grow in their professionalism.
  3. Sharing the outcome. Hourly workers at IPC are 40% owners in the company. They feel ownership, therefore, for its overall success. This also means, as stakeholders, employees transparently understand management-level decisions. This lays a foundation for “sharing the up & the down.” When the company is doing well, shareholders see higher returns. But when the company is in recession, management find ways to help employees keep their jobs without firing them. For example, they may say “we can only pay you for 4 days of work in the next 6 months.” This allows hourly workers to find other short-term work, while still having a well-paying job to return to once things stabilize.

The ultimate social value that IPC creates is that 80% of their hourly employees and 100% of their salaried employees are still working in the industry and making more than they made when IPC originally hired him.

Most businesses would struggle to see an opportunity in hiring workers with limited education, who may not understand the importance of showing up to work every day, and who may not have relevant prior job experience. But Al Fuller and the Integrated Packaging Company have found a massive opportunity in training low-income workers, creating a profitable company and highly effective company, and measurably improving the lives of their employees.

Al Fuller is an inaugural Social Venture Network Hall of Fame honoree.  He will be inducted into the SVN Hall of Fame on November 13, 2012 at Gotham Hall in New York City


Share

Meaningful Media and the ‘Sustainability Ghetto’

Posted on: April 22nd, 2012 by socialventurenetwork No Comments

April 20, 2012

Written By Evan Coller, Social Venture Network

An energetic discussion took place this morning at the SVN 2012 Spring Member Gathering. Speakers Lance Laytner, Malachi Leopold and James Slezak placed the sustainable goods and social cause marketplace under the microscope, revealing key insights on how to engage consumers past the selling point and build consumer loyalty for sustainable products.

Lance Laytner, of Public Good Relations, cut the tape with his insightful perspective as a long time journalist and media insider. He stated that a primary challenge for socially and economically conscious businesses is that their social values story is “not speaking the same language” as current news stories, and in order to shine light on the people and organizations that are making the world a better place businesses have to tap the main stream beat. He noted that he was inspired to create Public Good Relations after 9/11, when the fear and terror propaganda dominated the news arena.

Malachi Leopold’s brilliance as a social change entrepreneur, with current projects including LBRB Productions,  Trep Life, and an upcoming documentary “I Am The Water, You Are The Sea”, perfectly expressed the importance of creating exposure for these sensational stories of heroism in the triple-bottom line. He asked the attending group of 80 entrepreneurs – currently working to engage more people in value-added products -

“Are we changing behavior, or trying to move a product?”

The fact is, we need to dig deeper when marketing products that have a value greater than its functionality in order for people to not only buy it, but buy into it.

This engagement campaign, as Malachi said, is critical.

Lance Laytner is working with SVN to produce their 25th anniversary Hall of Fame Celebration at Gotham Hall, NYC November 13, 2012.

A major struggle that inspired conversation amongst the group was that most consumers have one thought when purchasing a product, What’s in it for me? In order for sustainable businesses to take inspire action from more pockets, the engagement campaign has to target the hopes, values and emotions of the buyer. Malachi mentioned this as following an Aspirational Communications Model. QR codes with supply chain stories (although only 6% of the population know how to use them), artisan diaries , and informative packaging were all examples that were mentioned as ways to build emotional connections with consumers and instill an earnest appreciation for company culture.

James Slezak, of Purpose.com, contributing his expertise on collective action, working on social action campaigns such as Livestrong and AVAAZ, to expand the conversation past access and engagement, to actually mobilizing a collective group of advocates. He explained that the rewards of interconnectedness are important in the growth of the movement, and that by creating new social norms we can begin to expand this “sustainability ghetto” that sustainable business owners feel like they are living in.

We won’t see the change we are looking for unless there is scale and people are mobilized to take action.  So how can we work as a collective to activate a majority class of non-practicing consumers?

Be sure to check out the SVN Sustainable Products & Services Directory for more insight on brands that are doing business the right way.

2012 Annual Member Gathering: Workshop & Discussion: Meaningful Media: Access, Engage & Mobilize

Share

Van Jones: Making sense of the Tea Party, the Occupy Movement, and Barack Obama’s shift from candidate to President

Posted on: April 15th, 2012 by socialventurenetwork No Comments

Mal Warwick reviews Rebuild the Dream, by Van Jones

Rebuild The Dream Cover

I always knew Van Jones was smart, but I didn’t know just how smart until I read Rebuild the Dream. In recent years, Jones has emerged as oneof the most charismatic and outspoken younger leaders of our time. This book proves he has also become one of the most insightful, too.

We live at a time when far too few of us can make sense of what’s happening around us. With the incessant noise of the news media, our full immersion online from dawn to dusk, and the endless distractions of entertainment reflecting a thousand subcultures, it’s all too easy to just lie back and let it all happen, convincing ourselves that no one could possibly perceive meaningful patterns in this donnybrook we call contemporary American life. Jones does, though.

In Rebuild the Dream, he asks — and answers — three questions:

“What can Americans who want to fix the system learn from the movement for hope and change that united around Barack Obama in 2008 — and from its collapse after he entered the White House?

“What can we learn from the Tea Party’s equally impressive capture of the national debate in 2009 — and its successful pivot to electoral politics in 2010?”

And what can we learn from the startling success of Occupy Wall Street in elevating economic inequality to the top of the political agenda in 2011 — and of its failure to translate that success into the electoral arena?

Rebuild the Dream has been greeted as a call to arms to progressives, an exhortation to reenergize ourselves for the November 2012 elections. That’s true, so far as it goes. But this book is far more valuable for its clear-eyed analysis of today’s political scene. Van Jones has devised a simple analytical framework through which we can see — clearly — the similarities and differences among the Occupy Wall Street and Tea Party movements and the 2008 Obama campaign and its aftermath. If Rebuild the Dream is useful as a guidebook for activists determined to swing the pendulum back to the left, in the long run it will be an even better resource for historians and social scientists attempting to understand this tumultuous era in American history.

However, simply as a call to arms, Rebuild the Dream is compelling: “The time has come to turn things right side up again and declare that America’s honest, hard-working middle class is too big to fail. The aspirations of our low-income, struggling, and marginalized communities are too big and important to fail . . . The American Dream itself is too big to fail.”

Read the full post on Mal’s blog.

Share

The New Jim Crow: One of the most important books published in English so far this century

Posted on: April 10th, 2012 by socialventurenetwork No Comments

Guest blogger Mal Warwick reviews The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness, by Michelle Alexander

157743379

Settle down now, class! It’s time for your pop quiz:

1. The number of Americans with criminal records is approximately: (a) 21.3 million, (b) 9 million, (c) 4.5 million, (d) 65 milion

2. The highest incidence of the use and sale of illegal drugs is found in communities characterized as: (a) Asian, (b) African-American, (c) Latino, (d) White

3. The percentage of federal prisoners convicted of violent crimes is (a) 31.2%, (b) 62%, (c) 85%, (d) 7.9%

4. The total number of Americans now in prisons and jails or on probation or parole is: (a) 4.8 million, (b) 3.5 million, (c) 2.1 million, (d) 7.4 million

5. The greatest increase in funding for the War on Drugs took place during the Administration of: (a) Ronald Reagan, (b) Barack Obama, (c) George W. Bush, (d) Bill Clinton

All done now? Ready for the answers?

If you answered (d) to each of these five questions, go to the head of the class. If you’re like me, however, chances are you got few if any of these right without first reading this book. And if you now read Michelle Alexander’s groundbreaking book, The New Jim Crow, you’ll come across a never-ending list of surprises about our country’s vaunted criminal justice system.

For example, “The United States imprisons a larger percentage of its black population than South Africa did at the height of apartheid.” In this extraordinary book, Prof. Alexander explains how this came about largely as a result of the so-called War on Drugs; how the country’s criminal justice system has been warped to the point of nonrecognition by a series of Presidential actions, Congressional legislation, and Supreme Court decisions; how the system of arrests, prosecution, conviction, and sentencing really works now; and the catastrophic consequences of this sequence of events for our cities, our African-American and Latino communities, and ourselves. The New Jim Crow is one of the most important books published in the English language in a great many years, because it dispels so many of our cherished illusions and takes no prisoners in naming those responsible or in proposing remedies.

To read the full post visit Mal’s blog.

Share

How Trayvon Martin Became a Missing White Girl

Posted on: April 1st, 2012 by socialventurenetwork No Comments

Guest post from Evan Shapiro as featured on the Huff Post Media Blog

When a young white girl goes missing in America, it immediately becomes a national story. Nancy Grace dedicates her show to every aspect of every missing girl, regardless how long a case drags out. These girls, their parents and everyone associated with them gets a magazine cover, or two, or three.

However, when a young black person is killed or goes missing in America, very few people outside their family hear about it. If not for his parents, their attorney, the current political season and the upswing of social media, this might too have been the case with Trayvon Martin.

I am not going to comment on the facts of this case. I am not qualified to remark on Florida Law nor knowledgeable enough to weigh in on the handling of the case by local authorities. My thoughts here are on how and why the American media spends disproportionate energy and resources on crimes involving white victims over those involving victims who are something other than white.

Historically, the homicide victimization rate for blacks is 6 times higher than that for whites (19.6 homicides per 100,000 versus 3.3). So, one might reason that more media attention is paid to white victims because they are, quite simply, rarer. On the other hand, one might surmise that the media — especially media in areas with a sizable non white population — has become inured to the killing of black Americans.

In my opinion, however, the truth lies somewhere deeper.

The 2010 Census reported that 63.7 percent of America is white; 12.6 percent is black; 16.3 percent is Hispanic or Latino and 4.8 percent is Asian. Sixty-four percent of America is white, 36 percent is not. However, The Radio Television Digital News Association reports that, as of 2011, 79.5 percent of all TV News jobs are held by white Americans, while 20.5 percent are held by minorities of any kind — an under-representation of minority Americans by a factor of nearly 2. Not great, but not awful either. However, 92.5 percent of all Television General Managers and 96.6 percent of Network TV Affiliate GMs are white, while only 7.5 percent of all TV GMs and 3.4 percent of Local TV Affiliates are another race. That is an under-representation of minority Americans by a factor of 5 on a national scale and a factor of 11 on a local scale. minority representation in the Newspaper business is similarly tilted. According to The American Society of News Editors, only 12.79 percent of all newspaper jobs are held by someone who is not white, with only 11 percent of Supervisor jobs held by non white Americans.

While it is great that black, Hispanic and Asian Americans are getting more jobs as reporters, photographers, camera operators and art directors, it is not the rank and file who determine which stories are covered and what America deems as “newsworthy.” These decisions are made at the Editorial and Director levels, where representation of the “minority” point of view is stunningly far behind that of the population they serve.

As Brian Stelter wrote in the New York Times, it took nearly a month for the killing of Trayvon Martin to become national news; and that only happened after his family — and thousands of online activists — repeatedly demanded attention for his story and secured the release of the 911 recording from the night of his shooting. In fact, as Brooke Gladstone reported on On The Media and Kelly McBride wrote about on Poynter, if not for several black journalists, including Trymaine Lee of the Huffington Post, Ta-Nehisi Coats of the Atlantic, Charles M. Blow of the New York Times, and Reverend Al Sharpton of MSNBC, it is doubtful anyone would know who Trayvon Martin is and was.

Please, PLEASE, don’t get me wrong — I am not saying there is overt or purposeful bias in America’s Newsrooms. I do submit, though, that the stunning under-representation of minorities at the TOP of our national and local news organizations creates an institutional lack of empathy for minority victims of violent crime. How else to explain the blanket coverage given every missing white girl in America, while it takes a month and a movement to get similar attention for the shooting of an unarmed black teenager, within eyeshot of his father’s house?

In order to better compete in the age of social media and asymmetrical media consumption, America’s media business must become more diverse. We cannot hope to serve the evolving needs of the American community, if we do not understand the ever-changing nature of the American experience. How can we report a story that we simply do not see? At this point, the failure of the media to evolve with the changing demography of those it serves is a demonstration of an industry slowly going blind to its own best interests.

The media, at its best, is meant to be a unifying experience, serving all people, equally. An unbiased, open media is the backbone of democracy. Yet, the story of Trayvon Martin came out despite the media, not because of it. As this story plays out, there will undoubtedly be calls to change many things in this country. If we, as an industry, hope to remain relevant, we must do what we can to change, from within.

Share

2012: Five Trends That’ll Matter Most

Posted on: January 26th, 2012 by socialventurenetwork No Comments

Written by Raphael Bemporad

Co-Founder & Chief Strategy Officer, BBMG


SVN members know the incredible power of socially responsible enterprise to pioneer more innovative, sustainable business models and empower healthier, happier and more engaged customers who can change the world through the marketplace.

As we mark 25 years of progress at SVN and re-dedicate ourselves to tackling the persistent challenges of the global economy, it’s a tremendous opportunity to lead the way in reshaping the traditional way of doing business—and create a better, smarter, more collaborative economy with shared value for more people across the globe.

Building on 100,000 consumer-generated ideas and insights in our collaboration platform, The Collective, BBMG has done some thinking about the trends that’ll be key in helping socially responsible companies achieve scale while driving positive impact in society. And, as originally noted in our guest blog for Sustainable Brands, we see major opportunities for companies that can effectively address these trends in 2012.

1. A C2C Marketplace

We are experiencing a fundamental paradigm shift from a business-to-consumer (B2C) marketplace to a consumer-to-business (C2B) and consumer-to-consumer (C2C) marketplace—where creating, buying, selling and sharing products and services will increasingly be driven by consumers themselves.

This is happening in the context of radical personalization, collaborative consumption and co-creativity, where brand purchases and experiences are dis-intermediated by traditional brands and retailers and unleashed via new technologies and platforms (from Good Guide to Etsy to Getaround) that firmly place more power in the hands of consumers.

Success now means rethinking sales channels toward more direct interaction and inviting consumers in to imagine, create and extend how our brands live in the world.

2. The Rise of Generation “Why?”

The rise of the C2C marketplace is driven in part by the influence of values-aspirational, practically minded New Consumers looking for brands that deliver total value: products that work well, cost less, last longer and do some good.

Youthful, educated, wired and mostly female, this New Consumer is asking “why” they should care about brands; and, if they can’t find what they’re looking for, “why not” just create the solutions themselves? New Consumers are more practical and more purposeful, and they’re not willing to wait.

And, with billions of these New Consumers entering the marketplace in developing economies, the key question will be whether brands can reach and delight them—beyond just more consumption—to inspire responsible purchases and deeper participation with health, happiness and sustainability in mind.

3. The Race to Relationship

Thanks to Groupon and its countless competitors, 2011’s year of the deal saw virtually every brand category join an unfortunate race to the lowest-price bottom that is destroying brand value, reducing consumers to commodities and undermining our shared, long-term success.

Sure, we dig deals and we always will. Yet by focusing so relentlessly on unsustainable price discounts, we undermine the very potential for our brands to do more and mean more for our customers.

Instead, we believe 2012 will see a race to relationship, where the most successful brands will break free of the lowest-price trap and deliver more value by empowering consumers with better products and experiences and championing their success. ­Patagonia’s disruptive Don’t Buy This Jacket campaign highlights this commitment to creating enduring products and relationships by promising to make “useful gear that lasts a long time” and inviting us to reduce, repair, reuse, recycle and reimagine how and what we consume together.

As one of our favorite clients says, “We don’t want a one-night-stand with our customers. We want long-term love affairs.”

4. The Imperative of Sustainable Brand Innovation

Whether it’s reducing resource risks in supply chains, driving efficiencies into workflows or reaping the rewards of increased transparency and corporate reputation, we believe sustainable brand innovation offers unmatched opportunity for exponential value creation for business, consumers, society and our planet.

In 2012, sustainable brands large and small will increasingly connect consumers, brand teams, suppliers and subject-matter experts in the innovation process to embed sustainability and social purpose into every business strategy, product design and stakeholder relationship.

Creating better brands, products, packaging and platforms, the highest performing companies will integrate practical, environmental and tribal benefits in every new offering—therefore becoming agents of change at a faster speed and larger scale than ever before.

5: The Evolution from Occupy to Engage

If the most emblematic word of 2011 was “occupy,” we believe the word of 2012 will be “engage.”

With an existential howl against the status quo, the global Occupy movement represents a deep yearning for a new way of doing business that replaces short-term, transactional, profit-only thinking with a more responsible, transparent and equitable economy that creates more value for more people in more ways.

In 2012, there is good reason to believe that the SVN community can lead the way.

In states from California to Maryland to New York, B Corporations are engaging policymakers to pass legislation that recognizes (and incentivizes) corporate accountability to all stakeholders: investors, consumers, employees, community members and the environment.

The Harvard Business Review hails the benefits of “The Good Company” that combines financial and social logic into its operations by engaging employees, partners and community institutions in building enduring value and success.

Meanwhile, pioneering brands from Stonyfield to Indigenous Designs to Guayaki are engaging consumers so they can live better and take action on issues that improve our shared future—from promoting sustainable agriculture to protecting endangered habitats to creating more opportunities for the producers of their products around the world.

As we celebrate SVN’s 25th anniversary and imagine the possibilities of the next 25 years, we believe the most successful brands will meet the needs, hopes and aspirations of New Consumers; build more respectful, collaborative and enduring relationships with all stakeholders; and unleash our collective co-creativity to bring better, smarter and more impactful ideas to life in ways that create shared value for all.

Share

The Common Good Enterprise – A New Term for an Emerging Sector

Posted on: January 13th, 2012 by socialventurenetwork No Comments

Written by Jim Epstein and Alicia Epstein Korten

As an investment advisor, I (Jim) am often asked to sit on nonprofit boards. I have grown uncomfortable with the term not-for-profit to describe these organizations, which often embrace business principles in their operations. For example, DC Greenworks generates income from government contracts and fees for green roof installations.

In 2002, I (Alicia) had difficulty finding graduate courses that blended business and social values. At a 2009 Net Impact conference, I was overwhelmed by the presence of over 2,000 MBA students interested in the common good.

A new sector is being born that blurs the lines between for-profit and not-for-profit worlds. Business used to be about jobs and profit. Civil society organizations were the avenues to give back beyond job creation and products.

Today, an increasing number of businesses are building healthy communities, living wages and sustainable products into their corporate DNA. And more civil society organizations are embracing business values.

The Private Sector Has a Broader Mission

Four hundred and seventy-six companies with $2.27 billion in annual revenue are certified now as B corporations, a designation given to businesses that meet environmental, governance and social criteria by the not-for-profit B Lab.

Certification has been followed by a tidal wave of state legislation giving such businesses legal jurisdiction. Maryland, Vermont, New Jersey, California, Hawaii, New York and Virginia are front runners. In 2012, Colorado, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Michigan and DC will likely follow.

This legislation is significant. It supersedes a body of law legally interpreted to mean that corporations must consider shareholder value before taking into account other stakeholders—including communities, employees and the planet.

Jim, who played a major role in passing two of these laws, co-founded a company that will become a B corporation called Blue Ridge Produce. The company aggregates locally grown food for sale to grocery stores and institutional buyers in the Washington DC area. With the common good built into its corporate DNA, Blue Ridge Produce aims to maintain a healthy farming community in the region and will:

  • provide secure markets for local farmers;
  • reduce the carbon footprint by keeping food closer to home; and
  • convert conventional growers to organic producers

Business networking organizations like the Social Venture Network (SVN)B LabSocial Enterprise AllianceInvestors’ Circle and the Business Alliance for Local Living Economies (BALLE) are further helping the trend become a global movement.

While the Nonprofit Sector is Adopting Business Principles

Change is also happening within civil society organizations, motivated in part by technology entrepreneurs grounding their philanthropy in business values. The Skoll Foundation funded by eBay mogul Jeffrey Skoll provides grantees funding to develop engines of growth. Called resource engines, some grantees are using funds to build business principles into their non-profit structures.

Created in 2009, the civil society organization Practice Greenhealth receives over half of its annual budget from membership dues paid by health providers like Kaiser Permanent in exchange for services aimed at greening their hospitals. Founder Gary Cohen built this resource engine after talking to entrepreneurs at the Skoll World Forum.

Language Is Powerful

Nothing captures an emerging trend like a name. A name can, in fact, determine whether an idea or product popularizes or stays relegated to a small group of believers. Just look at the dolphin fish. Only when restaurants began using its Hawaiian name Mahi-Mahi did this fish, which has no relation to the dolphin, begin to gain popularity in the United States. After all, who wants to eat Flipper with an apricot glaze?

Social enterprise, mission-driven business and for-benefit corporations are a few of the descriptors for organizations blending business principles with common good aims. We believe the movement can better communicate the power and purpose of this emerging field.

A New Operating System: The Common Good Enterprise

In our search for better lexicon, Jim came across a neglected phrase we would like to bring center stage: “the common good enterprise.” Why that term? Its power is its clarity.

Here’s our definition:

A for-profit or not-for-profit organization whose primary purpose is to promote the well-being of people and/or the planet.  The organization generates at least a percentage of its revenue through the sale of goods and services [adapted from Kevin Lynch (pictured left); Advertising on Higher Ground].

Common comes from the word “commons,” which describes a relationship to the community as a whole. Common good intuitively includes a regard for the planet, respect for individuals’ human rights, and support of communities.

The word “enterprise” is also self-explanatory—and speaks to revenue generated from the sale of goods and services. Common good enterprise is clearer than other terms such as its more popular sibling, “social enterprise.”  Does “social enterprise” exclusively describe businesses? Or non-profits? Does “social” include the planet? Only leaps of the imagination can make the connection.

Conclusion

The labels we use for this new field matter.  Easy-to-grasp language provides a framework to help the public co-create this emerging sector. Clear terms can translate into financial benefit. Why not pass legislation providing government procurement advantages to common good enterprises—whether companies or civil society organizations?  Could such language catalyze new capital pools?

It’s time to embrace “common good enterprise”—a term for organizations using business principles in support of the common good that will help mainstream the movement and make opportunities this field opens up a reality.

Is it time for a rejuvenated nomenclature?

Share